We're now hearing that "snatch squads" are picking up random people off the streets in the Twin Cities, and someone from Democracy Now has been detained.

You can follow the Twitter feed here.

We interviewed Bruce Nestor of the National Lawyer's Guild when we were at th 17th Street Raid.  He lives in the neighborhood and is representing one of the people who was arrested there. I'm including part of the transcript of the video because I think he contextualizes well what is happening:

Glenn Greenwald:  So what were they charged with?

Bruce Nestor: They were charged with conspiracy to commit riot, which is about as bullshit a charge -- about as thin a charge -- as you could possibly come up with.  And I say that as a lawyer.

Glenn Greenwald:  How do you distinguish between that and a protest?

Bruce:  You can't.  It basically criminalizes  political advocacy.  I mean, the essence of conspiracy law is if a single individual takes an overt act towards accomplishing an illegal goal such as purchasing a brick, and the police then  claim that someone else in his group has an intent to throw that brick, then everyone who advocates that you attend that demonstration...

Glenn:  Even if you're not intending to commit that crime...

Bruce:  ...even though you're not intending to commit the crime, could all be charged with conspiracy. 

Glenn: Is that a very rarely used statute in Minnesota?

Bruce:  In Minnesota it is hardly ever is used in state court.  Conspiracy is a popular charge of federal prosecutors, because it expands the realm of evidence.

Glenn:  But this specific conspiracy...

Nestor:  I've never seen it before.

Glen:  And you're a lawyer in Minnesota.

Nestor:  I'm a lawyer in Minnesota.

Glenn:  And you've never this seen it until this convention. 

Nestor:  That's right.    I will say that in 1968 the Chicago 8 were charged with conspiracy to riot.   Roundly criticized, in the however many years since now, thirty forty years, as a politically motivated prosecution -- as the type of charge  that really is criminalizing free speech activity, and putting people on trial..

Glenn:  I mean it clearly seems like it's clearly intending to intimidate.  You break into a house with 25 officers with submachine guns drawn and put them all on the floor and handcuff them, it's clearly sending a message that they might want to think twice about participating.

Nestor:  I do think....We're not in this country yet where we're having mass detentions of people like this, so it really is about sending a message.  I think what it really is designed to do is to send a message to people who agree with some of the viewpoints of people organizing activity and to say - you know what?  You can write an email, it's okay to write a letter, to vote, but don't go out in the street, don't organize public activity, because do you want us bursting into your house?  Do you want to be associated with people who are getting arrested?  It's designed to somehow say these aren't citizens engaged in the exercise of political freedom, but that  they're kooks, they're freaks, they're dangerous, stay away from them, don't get involved.

Glenn:  And there's been no evidence that any actual violence or illegality has been committed, this is all preventative right, it's all anticipatory?

Bruce:  That's right.

During the 2000 RNC, police also targeted protesters.  And the Minnesota Independent has been reporting that the $50 million security budget for the Minneapolis RNC was redacted by the Department of Justice for "security reasons."  This isn't about breaking up a legitimate threat, it's about intimidating people from engaging in their right of assembly.

Twin Cities Indymedia is covering these raids as they happen. The Uptake is also supplying good coverage.  And as I type Glenzilla is also talking to lawyers from the National Lawyers Guild.

More to come.